
While the agency may issue a public health-related “emergency temporary standard (ETS),” only once since Richard Nixon signed into law the Occupational Safety and Health Act on Dec. It “fails almost completely to address, or even respond to, much of this reality and common sense.”įriday’s ruling requires OSHA to “take no steps to implement or enforce the mandate until further court order.” The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has no authority to “make sweeping pronouncements on matters of public health affecting every member of society in the profoundest of ways.” “The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions - even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials.” “Of course, the principles at stake when it comes to the mandate are not reducible to dollars and cents.” “From economic uncertainty to workplace strife, the mere specter of the mandate has contributed to untold economic upheaval in recent months,” adding: Engelhardt said the following for the Court’s three-judge panel: “Because the petitions give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the mandate, the mandate is hereby STAYED pending further action by this court.”

On November 6, the Fifth Circuit’s Court of Appeals ruled as follows: The mandate and related policies flagrantly breach international and constitutional law.Īll things health related require voluntary consent, no exceptions legally permitted. Noncomplying with the draconian mandate to destroy health assures stiff punishment.Ĭomplying with what no one should tolerates increases outbreaks, other illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths - the aim of US dark forces. The same holds for healthcare facilities that receive Medicare and/or Medicaid payments, US contractors and Pentagon military personnel. It temporarily blocked the Biden regime’s tyrannical mandate for private entities with 100 or employees “to ensure their workforces are fully (jabbed with health-destroying toxins) or show a negative test at least once a week.” On November 6, a 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals three-judge panel issued a restraining order.
